Max Heart Rate Calculator
| Age | 220 - age | Tanaka | Gulati (women) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 200 | 194 | 188 |
| 25 | 195 | 191 | 184 |
| 30 | 190 | 187 | 180 |
| 35 | 185 | 184 | 175 |
| 40 | 180 | 180 | 171 |
| 45 | 175 | 177 | 166 |
| 50 | 170 | 173 | 162 |
| 55 | 165 | 170 | 158 |
| 60 | 160 | 166 | 153 |
| 65 | 155 | 163 | 149 |
| 70 | 150 | 159 | 144 |
Beats per minute. Three formulas, three answers, and none of them is your number: individual max heart rate scatters roughly 10 to 12 beats either side of any age prediction. A hard session with a chest strap beats all three.
Your estimated max heart rate is 220 minus your age, or 208 minus 0.7 times your age, or 206 minus 0.88 times your age, depending on which formula you trust. For a 40-year-old that is 180, 180 and 171. The calculator above prints all three, builds five training zones from the Tanaka estimate, and if you type in the highest number a chest strap ever showed you, it tells you how far each formula missed.
Max heart rate calculator: what it does
Enter your age. That is the whole requirement. You get the 220-minus-age number, the Tanaka number and the Gulati number in beats per minute, then Zone 1 through Zone 5 as percent-of-max bands built on Tanaka, since it holds up best across the age range. Add a resting heart rate and the zones switch to heart rate reserve, the Karvonen method, which counts up from your resting rate instead of from zero and lands each band a few beats higher. Add an observed max from a hard session and the calculator rebuilds every zone on that number and shows the gap to each formula, signed, so you can see which way the textbook missed you.
Three formulas by age
| Age | 220 minus age | Tanaka (208 - 0.7 x age) | Gulati (206 - 0.88 x age) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 200 | 194 | 188 |
| 25 | 195 | 191 | 184 |
| 30 | 190 | 187 | 180 |
| 35 | 185 | 184 | 175 |
| 40 | 180 | 180 | 171 |
| 45 | 175 | 177 | 166 |
| 50 | 170 | 173 | 162 |
| 55 | 165 | 170 | 158 |
| 60 | 160 | 166 | 153 |
| 65 | 155 | 163 | 149 |
| 70 | 150 | 159 | 144 |
movementrebels.com
All figures in beats per minute. Read across any row. At 20 the formulas disagree by 12 beats. At 40 the first two agree and Gulati sits 9 lower. By 70 the order has flipped, with Tanaka 9 beats above the gym-poster number. None of that spread is your body. It is three lines drawn through three different piles of data, and the piles disagree about the slope.
Where the formulas come from
220 minus age was never a study. It came from a line eyeballed through pooled data around 1971, it stuck because you can do it in your head, and it runs high for people in their twenties and low for anyone past 40, which is the worst possible shape for a formula most people first meet at 45. Tanaka, Monahan and Seals published 208 minus 0.7 times age in 2001, a meta-analysis of 351 studies and 18,712 people, and it is the default in current ACSM guidance. Gulati and colleagues derived 206 minus 0.88 times age in 2010 from 5,437 women in the St James Women Take Heart project, because the older formulas had been fitted mostly to men and were sending women to the wrong heart rate targets in stress tests. If you are a woman, Gulati is the closer starting point. If you are a man, Tanaka.
Why an observed max beats all three
Population scatter around any of these lines is roughly 10 to 12 beats, and that is one standard deviation, so a third of people sit further out than that and two healthy 40-year-olds can have true maxes of 165 and 195 with nothing wrong with either heart. Max heart rate is inherited. Training barely moves it. The formula cannot see any of this. A chest strap can.
Here is the session. Warm up 15 minutes easy, then find a hill that takes two to three minutes to climb. Go up hard, jog down, go up harder, jog down, then a third time all out with the last 30 seconds as ugly as you can make it. The highest reading on that last repeat is your working max. A 5 km race run properly gets you within a beat or two as well, and the final rep of a hard interval session often does. Wear a chest strap, not the wrist: optical sensors lag and drop out at the exact moment you need them.
One more honest thing. Most people never touch their true max in training. The hill session gets you within two or three beats if you go through with the last rep, and everything else you do, steady intervals, tempo runs, every easy day, sits far below it. So if the highest number in your watch history is 178 and the formula says 180, do not assume the formula is right and you were lazy. Assume the 178 is closer and train off it.
Turning the max into zones
Once you have a number you trust, the zone maths is quick. Percent of max gives Zone 2 at 60 to 70 percent, which for a max of 186 is 112 to 130 bpm. Heart rate reserve gives the same zone as 60 to 70 percent of the gap between resting and max, added back on top of resting, so with a resting rate of 50 the band moves to 132 to 145 bpm. Twenty beats. A fit person with a low resting rate is underestimated by the plain percent method in every zone, which is the case for entering your resting heart rate. The heart rate zone calculator does the full five-zone build with a threshold option as well, and the Zone 2 calculator checks your easy ceiling against a real 50-minute session using heart rate drift.
What max heart rate does not tell you
A high max is not fitness. A low max is not a problem. The number says nothing about your aerobic capacity, your threshold or how fast you run; a 60-year-old with a max of 155 can hold a higher percentage of it for an hour than a 25-year-old with a max of 200. If you want the engine size, run a field test. The Cooper test, the Rockport walk test and the Queens College step test each return an estimated VO2 max, and the Harvard step test scores how fast your heart recovers. Max heart rate is the anchor for zones. Nothing more.
How Movement Rebels fits
The coach reads heart rate, HRV and resting heart rate from synced Garmin Connect and Apple Health data, along with your last 14 activities and the morning readiness check-in. It works from the heart rate your sessions produced. It does not re-estimate a max from your age, and it re-estimates nothing you did not sync. Set your zones on the watch from a measured max and the coach plans against the same bands you see on the wrist.
The three formulas, written out
| Formula | Equation | Where it comes from |
|---|---|---|
| 220 minus age | 220 - age | A line fitted to pooled data in the early 1970s. It overestimates in the young and underestimates after about 40. |
| Tanaka | 208 - (0.7 x age) | Tanaka, Monahan and Seals 2001, J Am Coll Cardiol. Meta-analysis of 351 studies, 18,712 people. The current default in ACSM guidance. |
| Gulati | 206 - (0.88 x age) | Gulati et al. 2010, Circulation. 5,437 asymptomatic women followed in the St James Women Take Heart project. |
Training zones from the Tanaka estimate
| Age | Est. max | 60 to 70% | 70 to 80% | 80 to 90% | 90 to 100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 194 | 116 to 136 | 136 to 155 | 155 to 175 | 175 to 194 |
| 25 | 191 | 115 to 134 | 134 to 153 | 153 to 172 | 172 to 191 |
| 30 | 187 | 112 to 131 | 131 to 150 | 150 to 168 | 168 to 187 |
| 35 | 184 | 110 to 129 | 129 to 147 | 147 to 166 | 166 to 184 |
| 40 | 180 | 108 to 126 | 126 to 144 | 144 to 162 | 162 to 180 |
| 45 | 177 | 106 to 124 | 124 to 142 | 142 to 159 | 159 to 177 |
| 50 | 173 | 104 to 121 | 121 to 138 | 138 to 156 | 156 to 173 |
| 55 | 170 | 102 to 119 | 119 to 136 | 136 to 153 | 153 to 170 |
| 60 | 166 | 100 to 116 | 116 to 133 | 133 to 149 | 149 to 166 |
| 65 | 163 | 98 to 114 | 114 to 130 | 130 to 147 | 147 to 163 |
| 70 | 159 | 95 to 111 | 111 to 127 | 127 to 143 | 143 to 159 |
| 75 | 156 | 94 to 109 | 109 to 125 | 125 to 140 | 140 to 156 |
| 80 | 152 | 91 to 106 | 106 to 122 | 122 to 137 | 137 to 152 |
Percentages of maximum heart rate, beats per minute. Percentage of heart rate reserve (the Karvonen method) puts the same zones a few beats higher and is what the calculator uses when you enter a resting heart rate.
Questions
How do I calculate my max heart rate?
Subtract your age from 220 for the quick version. Tanaka, 208 minus 0.7 times age, is more accurate across the age range. Gulati, 206 minus 0.88 times age, was derived in women. For a 50-year-old those give 170, 173 and 162, and the calculator prints all three.
What is a normal max heart rate for my age?
Roughly the Tanaka number plus or minus 12 beats. A 40-year-old lands anywhere from about 168 to 192 and is normal across the whole range. Max heart rate is inherited, not trained.
Is 220 minus age accurate?
Not for individuals. The standard error is about 10 beats, it overshoots in the twenties and undershoots after 40, and it is fine for a rough zone on day one and wrong by 15 or more for a third of the people using it.
Which formula should women use?
Gulati, 206 minus 0.88 times age, was fitted to 5,437 women and predicts a lower max than the men-heavy formulas at every age past 20. A measured max still beats it.
Can I find my max heart rate without a test?
Check your watch history for the highest reading from a 5 km race or a hard hill session with a chest strap. That is closer than any formula. Ignore spikes from optical wrist sensors, which are usually cadence lock rather than heart rate.
Does max heart rate go down with age?
Yes, by roughly 0.7 beats per year on average, which is the slope in the Tanaka formula. Training does not slow that. What training raises is the percentage of max you can hold.
Why is my max heart rate higher than the formula says?
Because the formula is an average and you are one person. Twelve beats above the prediction is common and healthy. If a wrist sensor shows 20 or more above it, suspect the sensor before your heart.
More heart & recovery tools
Zone 2 Heart Rate: Find Your Real Z2
The full breakdown behind this calculator.
Your numbers, working for you.
Connect Garmin or Apple Health and your AI coach uses results like this to shape every session. One app instead of five, 7-day free trial, no card.
Start 7-day trial